<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tools N Gadgets &#187; motoblur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toolsngadgets.com/topics/motoblur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com</link>
	<description>All the tools and gadgets news you can use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:25:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Super Bowl Ads 2010: Lots of Chips and Beer, Light On Gadgets [Super Bowl]</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-ads-2010-lots-of-chips-and-beer-light-on-gadgets-super-bowl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-ads-2010-lots-of-chips-and-beer-light-on-gadgets-super-bowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CellPhones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vizio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5466348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/02/superbowlads.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/02/500x_superbowlads.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Did you blink during the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #superbowl" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/superbowl/">Super Bowl</a> commercial breaks? Too bad if you did, because it means you may have missed the anemic number of gadget or tech-related commercials worth talking about tomorrow at the water cooler. But! <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #meganfox" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/meganfox/">Megan Fox</a>!</p><p>Megan Fox is an obvious choice, for obvious reasons (if she's your thing): She had a Motoblur, and we're a gadget blog! See? Obvious. Anyway, tweeting from a tub on her new phone, she pondered what would happen if she sent a picture of her bathing out to the world. Hijinks ensued, people were hurt, and even a gay couple somehow got distracted by the fox that is Megan Fox:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: qffDaLmDinw -->
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/qffDaLmDinw&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/qffdalmdinw.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"><!-- /videoId: qffDaLmDinw --></p>
<p>And such is the power of Fox that there were scenes that <a href="http://www.motorola.com/staticfiles/Consumers/US-EN/super-bowl-commercial/postgame.html">didn't make the final cut.</a></p>
<p>Then there was Beyonce, fresh off her Grammy performance, performing again for Vizio. Surrounded by Internet memes and celebrities, Twitter and what appeared to be an army of automobile assembly line robots (hopefully not ones from Toyota), she sang and sold that company's Via/Internet Apps technology. Think Internet on your HDTV, not because I say so or because that's exactly what it is, but because that's the message Vizio assaulted viewers with during the 60-second clip:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: cHxmRSYDazE -->
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/cHxmRSYDazE&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/chxmrsydaze.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"><!-- /videoId: cHxmRSYDazE --></p>
<p>Tough love was the story for Intel's Jeffrey the Robot. The commercial was supposedly for Intel's Core processor line, but I know the truth: Robot uprising. It 20 years' time we can all look back at this commercial, when poor Jeffrey was snubbed For The Last Time by his human overlords:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: bbifmRBBN6Q -->
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/bbifmRBBN6Q&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/bbifmrbbn6q.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"><!-- /videoId: bbifmRBBN6Q --></p>
<p>Lastly, there's one we actually <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5465890/googles-superbowl-ad-has-google-ceo-eric-schmidt-all-atwitter">covered yesterday.</a> Google. Its poignant ad about a search-happy boy in love with a French girl aired yesterday, on the Internet, which is probably fitting. We'll revisit it again here if you missed it tonight:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: nnsSUqgkDwU -->
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/nnsSUqgkDwU&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/nnssuqgkdwu_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"><!-- /videoId: nnsSUqgkDwU -->Sigh.</p>
<p>Personally, for me the ads were a bit stale this year. Even the Bud Light beer ads, which have made me laugh out loud on occasion in years past, felt a little tired. Betty White was a standout though, and there were back-to-back ads depicting grown men in their underwear. Possibly a first there. Also a first: Seeing a two-timing baby talk about eTrade while his "milk-a-holic" girl on the side blew up his shit over a webcam.</p>
<p>The one Bud Light ad I will give props to, however, was their Autotune bit. It's a stretch including here on Gizmodo, but we have a history with that app (iPhone, anyone?), and we'll take an opportunity here to thank Budweiser for hopefully killing the tech off for good with this Super Bowl ad:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: mXoPloew3bk -->
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/mXoPloew3bk&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/mxoploew3bk.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"><!-- /videoId: mXoPloew3bk --></p>
<p>OK, I admit it, I smiled a bit watching that a second time. Guilty.</p>
<p>The entire crop is over at YouTube in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/superbowl">one convenient package</a> (Fox's is notably absent at the moment, although they appear to be updating throughout the night).</p><br />
<br />
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=f6aaa912dba226d21d35633fea436684&#38;p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0" border="0"></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0"><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:H0mrP-F8Qgo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/b2SOkJFTp_4" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/02/superbowlads.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/02/500x_superbowlads.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Did you blink during the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #superbowl" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/superbowl/" rel="nofollow">Super Bowl</a> commercial breaks? Too bad if you did, because it means you may have missed the anemic number of gadget or tech-related commercials worth talking about tomorrow at the water cooler. But! <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #meganfox" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/meganfox/" rel="nofollow">Megan Fox</a>!</p>
<p>Megan Fox is an obvious choice, for obvious reasons (if she&#8217;s your thing): She had a Motoblur, and we&#8217;re a gadget blog! See? Obvious. Anyway, tweeting from a tub on her new phone, she pondered what would happen if she sent a picture of her bathing out to the world. Hijinks ensued, people were hurt, and even a gay couple somehow got distracted by the fox that is Megan Fox:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: qffDaLmDinw --><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/qffDaLmDinw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/qffdalmdinw.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><!-- /videoId: qffDaLmDinw --></p>
<p>And such is the power of Fox that there were scenes that <a href="http://www.motorola.com/staticfiles/Consumers/US-EN/super-bowl-commercial/postgame.html" rel="nofollow">didn&#8217;t make the final cut.</a></p>
<p>Then there was Beyonce, fresh off her Grammy performance, performing again for Vizio. Surrounded by Internet memes and celebrities, Twitter and what appeared to be an army of automobile assembly line robots (hopefully not ones from Toyota), she sang and sold that company&#8217;s Via/Internet Apps technology. Think Internet on your HDTV, not because I say so or because that&#8217;s exactly what it is, but because that&#8217;s the message Vizio assaulted viewers with during the 60-second clip:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: cHxmRSYDazE --><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/cHxmRSYDazE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/chxmrsydaze.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><!-- /videoId: cHxmRSYDazE --></p>
<p>Tough love was the story for Intel&#8217;s Jeffrey the Robot. The commercial was supposedly for Intel&#8217;s Core processor line, but I know the truth: Robot uprising. It 20 years&#8217; time we can all look back at this commercial, when poor Jeffrey was snubbed For The Last Time by his human overlords:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: bbifmRBBN6Q --><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/bbifmRBBN6Q&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/bbifmrbbn6q.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><!-- /videoId: bbifmRBBN6Q --></p>
<p>Lastly, there&#8217;s one we actually <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5465890/googles-superbowl-ad-has-google-ceo-eric-schmidt-all-atwitter" rel="nofollow">covered yesterday.</a> Google. Its poignant ad about a search-happy boy in love with a French girl aired yesterday, on the Internet, which is probably fitting. We&#8217;ll revisit it again here if you missed it tonight:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: nnsSUqgkDwU --><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/nnsSUqgkDwU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/nnssuqgkdwu_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><!-- /videoId: nnsSUqgkDwU -->Sigh.</p>
<p>Personally, for me the ads were a bit stale this year. Even the Bud Light beer ads, which have made me laugh out loud on occasion in years past, felt a little tired. Betty White was a standout though, and there were back-to-back ads depicting grown men in their underwear. Possibly a first there. Also a first: Seeing a two-timing baby talk about eTrade while his &#8220;milk-a-holic&#8221; girl on the side blew up his shit over a webcam.</p>
<p>The one Bud Light ad I will give props to, however, was their Autotune bit. It&#8217;s a stretch including here on Gizmodo, but we have a history with that app (iPhone, anyone?), and we&#8217;ll take an opportunity here to thank Budweiser for hopefully killing the tech off for good with this Super Bowl ad:</p>
<p><!-- videoId: mXoPloew3bk --><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/mXoPloew3bk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":412,"ratio":0.824,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube"} );
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/mxoploew3bk.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><!-- /videoId: mXoPloew3bk --></p>
<p>OK, I admit it, I smiled a bit watching that a second time. Guilty.</p>
<p>The entire crop is over at YouTube in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/superbowl" rel="nofollow">one convenient package</a> (Fox&#8217;s is notably absent at the moment, although they appear to be updating throughout the night).</p>
<p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/><br />
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/><br />
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=f6aaa912dba226d21d35633fea436684&#038;p=1" rel="nofollow"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=f6aaa912dba226d21d35633fea436684&#038;p=1"/></a><br />
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2226"/>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:H0mrP-F8Qgo" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:yIl2AUoC8zA" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:D7DqB2pKExk" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:V_sGLiPBpWU" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=b2SOkJFTp_4:5_wUZ9A35-o:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/b2SOkJFTp_4" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-ads-2010-lots-of-chips-and-beer-light-on-gadgets-super-bowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola &#8216;Calgary&#8217; to bring BLUR to Verizon, Droid not looking worried</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-worried/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-worried/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ziegler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VerizonWireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calgary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vzw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-w/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-live-photos-verizons-second-motorola-android-device/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2009/10/moto-calgary-bgr.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
The <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/droid">Droid's</a> shaping up to be a beast of an Android phone -- well played, Verizon -- but Motorola's banking much of its future on its MOTOBLUR platform, which the Droid curiously lacks (though Android 2.0 adds at least some of BLUR's functionality back in). Don't worry, though -- Verizon hasn't forgotten about BLUR altogether, and the rumored <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/Calgary/">Calgary</a> is looking to arrive as the carrier's next Android phone from Moto featuring BLUR in all its social network-aggregating glory. It's clearly positioned as a lower-end device than the Droid, stepping down to a 3 megapixel cam but still managing nifty features like an optical pad, 3.5mm jack, and naturally, a full QWERTY keyboard. Considering Rubin's ties to Danger, you could think of this as the ill-fated <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/sidekick,slide">Sidekick Slide</a> all grow'd up. Word has it this might hit before the end of the year, so we'll see just how much breathing room Verizon and Moto feel like giving the Droid before coming back for Round 2, eh?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-w/">Motorola 'Calgary' to bring BLUR to Verizon, Droid not looking worried</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-live-photos-verizons-second-motorola-android-device/">Read</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-w/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19202899/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-w/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-live-photos-verizons-second-motorola-android-device/" rel="nofollow"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2009/10/moto-calgary-bgr.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>The <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/droid" rel="nofollow">Droid&#8217;s</a> shaping up to be a beast of an Android phone &#8212; well played, Verizon &#8212; but Motorola&#8217;s banking much of its future on its MOTOBLUR platform, which the Droid curiously lacks (though Android 2.0 adds at least some of BLUR&#8217;s functionality back in). Don&#8217;t worry, though &#8212; Verizon hasn&#8217;t forgotten about BLUR altogether, and the rumored <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/Calgary/" rel="nofollow">Calgary</a> is looking to arrive as the carrier&#8217;s next Android phone from Moto featuring BLUR in all its social network-aggregating glory. It&#8217;s clearly positioned as a lower-end device than the Droid, stepping down to a 3 megapixel cam but still managing nifty features like an optical pad, 3.5mm jack, and naturally, a full QWERTY keyboard. Considering Rubin&#8217;s ties to Danger, you could think of this as the ill-fated <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/sidekick,slide" rel="nofollow">Sidekick Slide</a> all grow&#8217;d up. Word has it this might hit before the end of the year, so we&#8217;ll see just how much breathing room Verizon and Moto feel like giving the Droid before coming back for Round 2, eh?
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag nofollow">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag nofollow">Handhelds</a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-w/" rel="nofollow">Motorola &#8216;Calgary&#8217; to bring BLUR to Verizon, Droid not looking worried</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com" rel="nofollow">Engadget</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/" rel="nofollow">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href=http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-live-photos-verizons-second-motorola-android-device/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-w/" rel="bookmark nofollow" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19202899/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email" rel="nofollow">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-w/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry" rel="nofollow">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/20/motorola-calgary-to-bring-blur-to-verizon-droid-not-looking-worried/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola CLIQ available to T-Mobile customers now, great masses November 2</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses-november-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses-november-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vladislav Savov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BreakingNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MotorolaCliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-mobileUsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dext]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola cliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qwerty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.t-mobile.com/promotions/GenericRegular.aspx?PAsset=Pro_Pro_MotoCliqLaunch&#38;WT.mc_id=637m3"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/oct1909-motocliq.jpg" /></a></div>
Well now this is a pleasingly rapid transition from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/motorola-click-runs-android-headed-to-t-mobile/">announcement</a> to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/">review samples</a> to market availability. Motorola's Android-loving CLIQ (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/motorola-dext-goes-on-sale-in-the-uk-tomorrow-maybe-sneaking-ou/">already on sale</a> under the moniker DEXT in the UK), its QWERTY keyboard and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/motorola-impresses-with-pre-loaded-apps-list-for-cliq/">all the apps you could desire</a> are now ready to be had, should you already have an account with T-Mobile, the device's exclusive US carrier. It was expected that only pre-orders would be taken today, but it appears for all the world that T-Mobile is ready to start shipping the CLIQ to its loyal customers ahead of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/29/motorola-cliq-coming-to-t-mobile-this-november-for-200-on-contr/">November 2nd full release date</a>. Prices start from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/29/motorola-cliq-coming-to-t-mobile-this-november-for-200-on-contr/">previously reported</a> $200 on a two-year agreement -- a move that will give you plenty of time to wonder if you shouldn't have waited for more details about the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-droid-stands-in-for-glamorous-photo-shoot/">Droid mashup</a> from Verizon, Motorola, and Google.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses/">Motorola CLIQ available to T-Mobile customers now, great masses November 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.t-mobile.com/promotions/GenericRegular.aspx?PAsset=Pro_Pro_MotoCliqLaunch&#38;WT.mc_id=637m3">Read</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19200484/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.t-mobile.com/promotions/GenericRegular.aspx?PAsset=Pro_Pro_MotoCliqLaunch&amp;WT.mc_id=637m3" rel="nofollow"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/oct1909-motocliq.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>Well now this is a pleasingly rapid transition from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/motorola-click-runs-android-headed-to-t-mobile/" rel="nofollow">announcement</a> to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/" rel="nofollow">review samples</a> to market availability. Motorola&#8217;s Android-loving CLIQ (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/motorola-dext-goes-on-sale-in-the-uk-tomorrow-maybe-sneaking-ou/" rel="nofollow">already on sale</a> under the moniker DEXT in the UK), its QWERTY keyboard and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/motorola-impresses-with-pre-loaded-apps-list-for-cliq/" rel="nofollow">all the apps you could desire</a> are now ready to be had, should you already have an account with T-Mobile, the device&#8217;s exclusive US carrier. It was expected that only pre-orders would be taken today, but it appears for all the world that T-Mobile is ready to start shipping the CLIQ to its loyal customers ahead of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/29/motorola-cliq-coming-to-t-mobile-this-november-for-200-on-contr/" rel="nofollow">November 2nd full release date</a>. Prices start from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/29/motorola-cliq-coming-to-t-mobile-this-november-for-200-on-contr/" rel="nofollow">previously reported</a> $200 on a two-year agreement &#8212; a move that will give you plenty of time to wonder if you shouldn&#8217;t have waited for more details about the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-droid-stands-in-for-glamorous-photo-shoot/" rel="nofollow">Droid mashup</a> from Verizon, Motorola, and Google.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag nofollow">Cellphones</a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses/" rel="nofollow">Motorola CLIQ available to T-Mobile customers now, great masses November 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com" rel="nofollow">Engadget</a> on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/" rel="nofollow">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href=http://www.t-mobile.com/promotions/GenericRegular.aspx?PAsset=Pro_Pro_MotoCliqLaunch&amp;WT.mc_id=637m3>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses/" rel="bookmark nofollow" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19200484/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email" rel="nofollow">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry" rel="nofollow">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/19/motorola-cliq-available-to-t-mobile-customers-now-great-masses-november-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola CLIQ review</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ziegler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HandsOn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dext]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hands on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motocliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motodext]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qwerty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq60028-1255569205.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<span style="float: right;margin-bottom: 16px;margin-left: 4px"> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/Motorola_s_last_hope_the_CLIQ_reviewed'; </span> Palm and Motorola have taken very different paths to get where they are today; one began life as a scrappy Valley start-up founded by a tablet computing pioneer, the other traces its roots to all the way back to the early days of consumer electronics and the automotive industry. Yet somehow, through years (decades, even) of adventure, success, and misfortune, they've found themselves in exactly the same situation here in 2009: it's do-or-die time. Palm, of course, has elected to try its hand at resurrecting the very thing that took it to superstardom in the first place -- an elegant, tightly-controlled software platform of its own with hardware to match -- while Motorola has thrown virtually all of its remaining weight behind Android in the hope that it can catch a little mojo from Google's ecosystem.<br />
<br />
For Motorola, it's the wireless equivalent of stepping up to the roulette table, putting what's left of your depleted life savings on red, and letting it ride just as you see security guards off in the distance coming to throw you -- penniless -- off the premises. It's a gamble of the highest order, but it's also a gamble Motorola's painfully aware that it needs to take. North America's only top-five handset manufacturer needs nothing less than magic (and a little luck) to earn its way back into the world's wireless elite -- and that risky play starts right here, today, with the CLIQ / DEXT.<br />
<br />
So does the CLIQ pave the way to a New Motorola, or did the RAZR's checkered legacy ultimately dig a hole too deep to escape? Read on.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/">Motorola CLIQ review</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365551/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80001-1255558941_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365552/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80002-1255558942_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365554/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80003-1255558943_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365555/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80004-1255558944_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365556/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80005-1255558946_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Motorola CLIQ review</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/">Motorola CLIQ review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19196378/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq60028-1255569205.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p><span style="float: right; margin-bottom: 16px; margin-left: 4px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/Motorola_s_last_hope_the_CLIQ_reviewed'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js"></script></span> Palm and Motorola have taken very different paths to get where they are today; one began life as a scrappy Valley start-up founded by a tablet computing pioneer, the other traces its roots to all the way back to the early days of consumer electronics and the automotive industry. Yet somehow, through years (decades, even) of adventure, success, and misfortune, they&#8217;ve found themselves in exactly the same situation here in 2009: it&#8217;s do-or-die time. Palm, of course, has elected to try its hand at resurrecting the very thing that took it to superstardom in the first place &#8212; an elegant, tightly-controlled software platform of its own with hardware to match &#8212; while Motorola has thrown virtually all of its remaining weight behind Android in the hope that it can catch a little mojo from Google&#8217;s ecosystem.</p>
<p>For Motorola, it&#8217;s the wireless equivalent of stepping up to the roulette table, putting what&#8217;s left of your depleted life savings on red, and letting it ride just as you see security guards off in the distance coming to throw you &#8212; penniless &#8212; off the premises. It&#8217;s a gamble of the highest order, but it&#8217;s also a gamble Motorola&#8217;s painfully aware that it needs to take. North America&#8217;s only top-five handset manufacturer needs nothing less than magic (and a little luck) to earn its way back into the world&#8217;s wireless elite &#8212; and that risky play starts right here, today, with the CLIQ / DEXT.</p>
<p>So does the CLIQ pave the way to a New Motorola, or did the RAZR&#8217;s checkered legacy ultimately dig a hole too deep to escape? Read on.</p>
<div class="postgallery">
<p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/" rel="nofollow">Motorola CLIQ review</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365551/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80001-1255558941_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365552/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80002-1255558942_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365554/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80003-1255558943_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365555/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80004-1255558944_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-cliq-review/2365556/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/cliq80005-1255558946_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/" rel="bookmark nofollow">Continue reading <em>Motorola CLIQ review</em></a></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag nofollow">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag nofollow">Handhelds</a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/" rel="nofollow">Motorola CLIQ review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com" rel="nofollow">Engadget</a> on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/" rel="nofollow">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/" rel="bookmark nofollow" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19196378/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email" rel="nofollow">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry" rel="nofollow">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola Cliq Review [Review]</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CellPhones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moto cliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola cliq review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5381995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/motomotocliq2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_motomotocliq2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>When a once leading&#8212;now <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377572/the-jd-power-smartphone-satisfaction-ratings-give-apple-a-win-motorola-a-big-lose">last place</a> &#8212;smartphone maker dumps Windows Mobile and goes Android, it's an all or nothing decision. Who knew that this could save the company?</p> <p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356590/motorola-cliq-android-smartphone-everything-you-need-to-know">Motorola Cliq</a> is the Android OS on Motorola hardware. Like Palm before it, Motorola decided that Windows Mobile 6.5/7 would be too little, too late to combat the iPhone menace. But instead of going in house and creating something from scratch, Motorola decided to take an already stable OS and build social networking features directly into the interface. So yes, it's basically an Android phone; but it's an Android phone++.</p> <p>Motorola's Cliq delivers on its social networking promise quite admirably, even if there are a few design quirks that prevent the experience from being perfect. And although it's a little sluggish on the hardware side&#8212;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381829/why-android-phones-are-slow-today">as sluggish as any of the other Android phones out there now</a>, that is&#8212;the fact that it has a good physical keyboard and solid Motorola hardware behind it makes the Cliq a very interesting contender in the Android world.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cliq4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cliq4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <h1>The Hardware is solid, except when it's not</h1> <p>Moto is no stranger to building its own phones, so you'd expect some smart hardware know-how to go into Cliq's design. That's only kinda true. Everything on the phone is where you'd expect it to be and buttons are more-or-less in acceptable locations, but there's a looseness in the slide-out keyboard that's more irritating the more I play with it. I can't tell if it's because the slider doesn't quite lock into place like it should&#8212;there's a little give in both the open and closed positions&#8212;but the "Oreo-ing" is really distracting. It's not as if the screen portion will pop off, it's just an annoying looseness in the phone that makes you feel like they didn't quite solve the puzzle of fitting everything in place.</p> <p>A hardware keyboard is always a welcome thing to have, and the Cliq's behaves well. There's enough spacing in each of the keys that it's easy to type, but not too much that it's occupying a lot of space. There could have been some better arrangement of symbol keys (the underscore is buried under a symbols menu), but that's just being nitpicky. Overall, it's a solid keyboard that's quick to enter data with.</p> <h1>Other build quirks</h1> <p>The wobbliness of the slider means that you need to grip only the bottom (keyboard) part of the phone when you're taking a photo, or else the screen will slide open and you'll probably drop your phone. Also, Motorola decided to make the power switch flush with the right side of the phone so even Daredevil would have a hard time finding it by touch. Since the power button also lets you toggle Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, airplane mode and GPS, that's a bad design.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cliq2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cliq2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You have to open up the battery cover to shove an up-to 32GB microSD card in there, but since you'll rarely replace that (use a microUSB to transfer files), it's not a huge deal. I do like the fact that there's no cover on the microSD slot, as well as the presence of the now-obligatory vibrate toggle on the left side of the phone. Its 3.5mm headphone jack being located directly on the top of the phone kinda screws up the lines a bit, but I'd rather a slightly uglier phone than not having a 3.5mm jack.</p> <h1>Power and battery</h1> <p>Because the Cliq runs the same processor as the current Android phones now&#8212;like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">Hero</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5331798/t+mobile-mytouch-3g-review">MyTouch 3G</a>&#8212;there's not a whole lot of performance difference between the devices. They're all kinda slow. Not unusably slow, but transitions and animations don't pop immediately. And this sluggishness might be part of the reason why interacting with the touchscreen isn't as fluid a process as it could be, and why sometimes when you're swiping between emails or tweets, the page will pop back into place and you have to swipe a second time.</p> <p>As for the battery life, you can pretty much imagine how much use you'll get out of an always-connected device that gets pushed emails, tweets and Facebook updates all day. Even if you don't make a lot of calls, you'll have to charge the device every night. And if you do do a lot of texting and emailing and calling and tweeting, you'd better get an external charger.</p> <p>The main drain seems to be both the push and the fact that you're using the phone a lot to keep up with everything that's happening on your social networks. Motorola built a double-edged sword on that one; people want to use it a lot for checking status updates, but in turn the 1420 mAh battery runs out in less than a day.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cliq1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cliq1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <h1>Hardware features we like</h1> <p>There are a couple nice touches that we're appreciative of, such as the blinking light on the front for notifications, which has been on BlackBerries for a while. Great if you don't get a lot of emails or if you don't follow a lot of people. You can also wake up the phone using the facebuttons, not just the power toggle, so two quick menu button presses will get you to the home screen immediately.</p> <p>Having a D pad is going to be useful in the future when Android developers start making games that take advantage of it, but you can use it now in NES/SNES emulators. And the camera is a beefy 5-megapixel autofocus, which produces decent photos compared to other Android phones. Plus, call quality is pretty good, something Motorola has managed to do well even when their software has faltered.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/thescreen.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_thescreen.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <h1>Software</h1> <p>Seeing as Android has been available for more than a while, and everyone should be familiar with what it does, I'm going to focus on the Cliq-specific sections. Suffice it to say that it can do everything other Android phones can, including downloading OTA Amazon MP3s and accessing all the apps in the Marketplace. The most important of Motorola's additions are the home screen widgets, so we'll start there.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/home1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_home1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <h1>The home screen widgets</h1> <p>The four widgets of note are the status widget, the messaging widget, the happenings widget and the news/RSS widget. The news widget is self-explanatory, and really cool that a phone would have a built-in RSS reader right on the home screen, but the others are a little bit trickier. The status widget lets you update your "status" to any of your social networking sites, like Facebook or Twitter. The messages widget consolidates ALL your 1:1 messaging, like emails, SMS, DMs on Twitter or private messages on Facebook. The happenings is a feed of <i>other people's</i> status updates on your social networks.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/6_01.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_6_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Messaging Widget</strong><br /> I don't know why, but it's very satisfying to be able to swipe through your emails directly from the home screen, quickly deleting or replying with just one tap. The problem comes from the way it's implemented and the lack of screen space, because you can't see the recipients list to see if you're the only person address to in an email, nor can you do a reply all if there are multiple people. And it doesn't tell you if you have an attachment.</p> <p>Basically it's just a small window to your email, and you'll have to actually open up the traditional email app to do any communication beyond the basics. And there's also a full-blown Messaging APP, which consolidates all your accounts like the widget does.</p> <p><strong>Happenings Widget</strong><br /> This is where your all your social networks are rolled into one big feed. Again, it's a time saver to have all these updates in one place and being able to swipe through them, though sometimes you get way too many updates to realistically do so. What we would like is if there was an option to customize <i>which</i> networks displayed in the widget, so we could, say, have only Twitter and leave out Facebook. Right now it's an all or nothing affair, and you have to go into the Happenings app to see everything in list form and to be able to view only one network at a time.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/home2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_home2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The widget does allow you to directly interact and respond to people's updates, so you can comment on people's walls or do an @reply to someone's tweet. All you have to do is start typing in a particular section and some menu option will pop up, prompting you with context-specific actions you can do.</p> <p><strong>News Widget</strong><br /> The RSS widget behaves pretty much the same way as the previous two, allowing you to swipe through news items like you would in a standard RSS reader. Motorola was kind enough to bundle a few types of RSS feeds together, and Gizmodo is part of the Technology one. Good choice dudes.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/adams.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_adams.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <h1>Nice touches</h1> <p>By avoiding the creation of an entire operation system from scratch, the Motorola engineers had time on their hands to really think about the user experience, and it definitely shows in all these small touches and shortcuts they put in.</p> <p>&#8226; There are some slick transition animations when you open up widgets and apps, which are quick enough to not be distracting, but slow enough to distract you for a second while your program is loading<br /> &#8226; Faces are fetched and attached to your contacts automatically, and you can choose whether you want to grab the images from Google or Facebook. This way you can always have some kind of picture for a person when they call you for easy recognition<br /> &#8226; The MotoBlur account you have to create on setup backs up some of your settings so that you can re-load it in the event of phone theft<br /> &#8226; Speaking of phone stealing, there's a free service online that's similar to MobileMe that you can use to locate your phone from the web<br /> &#8226; There's a five panel home screen. Eh? Ehh??<br /> &#8226; The call button got moved to a soft button, eliminating the need for two hard buttons on the outside of the phone. You also get a contacts button instead of a end call button, since you don't need to hang up if you're not in a call.<br /> &#8226; There's visual voicemail<br /> &#8226; People's faces everywhere, and you can see their latest status updates when a call is initiated<br /> &#8226; You can manually link contacts together, like on Palm's webOS, in case the phone doesn't automatically recognize that Frucci is the same Adam Frucci you have in your Gmail<br /> &#8226; A self help widget is there when you get the phone, walking you through a few features you might not see<br /> &#8226; There are shortcuts everywhere, which would usually be a bad thing since you have to poke around to find them, but they're implemented in such a way that it actually makes sense<br /> &#8226; You can type on the home screen to find a contact. This makes sense in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOTO CLIQ" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/moto-cliq/">Moto Cliq</a> world since the Cliq is a person-centric device, whereas on other phones it would make more sense to bring up a Google search instead<br /> &#8226; And typing in the applications tray searches through your apps</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/search.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_search.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <h1>Gripes</h1> <p>The software's not flawless, however, and you will run into some minor annoyances even with all the niceties.<br /> &#8226; Yahoo Mail only works over 3G, not Wi-Fi. This most likely has to do with some deal or legal restriction, but it doesn't make the decision less annoying. If we had to choose between Yahoo only on 3G and no Yahoo, we'd pick the 3G<br /> &#8226; There isn't really desktop syncing for your contacts or calendar. You can send movies and music and photos over the microUSB connection, but Motorola really wants you to put your contacts on either Gmail or a social network and pull them down that way</p> <p>You don't get a lot of fine-grained control over accounts. (Yes, I made you wait this long for a pun on the top photo.) For example, you can't tell your phone to only pull down contacts from Gmail and not Facebook, or choose to display only your Twitter and MySpace contacts at once. It's basically all or just one. <strong>More account customizability would be the number one software target we'd ask Motorola's team to aim for</strong>, and something we're eager to see in Blur version 1.5.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/motomotocliq.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_motomotocliq.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <h1>The Whole Experience</h1> <p>Like we said in the hardware section, the major thing holding back the Cliq from being a fantastic phone is the processor. The animations are smooth, the UI touches are smart and the social networking stuff is useful; we just wish we could have a bit more account customization, do all of that on faster hardware. Once Motorola gets the Blur platform onto a more powerful phone and works through some of the software quirks we noticed, they're going to have a really good Android phone on their hands.</p> <p>Is this the phone that Motorola needs to bring it back into the smartphone race? It could be. They were smart enough to know that just doing another Android phone wasn't enough in itself, so they pulled together and created all this social networking glue to bind the experience together. It's cohesive enough to call the Cliq a different experience from other, similar devices like the Sprint HTC Hero, and is a pretty damn good first step in a possible Motorola comeback. [<a href="http://www.motorola.com/consumers/US-EN/Motorola-CLIQ-US-EN.do?vgnextoid=62045a6e00be2210VgnVCM1000006d06b10aRCRD">Motorola</a>]</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Social networking features are quite good<br /> <br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Lots of little touches that improve on the base Android platform<br /> <br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Hardware keyboard<br /> <br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">Decent hardware except for the Oreo-like keyboard action<br /> <br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's an Android phone at heart, which means you'll either like it or dislike it, based on how you feel about the platform<br /> <br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">A slow-ish CPU makes the experience weaker than it could be</p> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=246cae4d769df99fd5bada23c0954d8c&#38;p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0" border="0"></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0">
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lwu8khnKTMiW8mtvE6cbrShPg5g/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lwu8khnKTMiW8mtvE6cbrShPg5g/0/di" border="0"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lwu8khnKTMiW8mtvE6cbrShPg5g/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lwu8khnKTMiW8mtvE6cbrShPg5g/1/di" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:H0mrP-F8Qgo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/f_6GNnnOlzg" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/motomotocliq2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_motomotocliq2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>When a once leading&mdash;now <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377572/the-jd-power-smartphone-satisfaction-ratings-give-apple-a-win-motorola-a-big-lose" rel="nofollow">last place</a> &mdash;smartphone maker dumps Windows Mobile and goes Android, it&#8217;s an all or nothing decision. Who knew that this could save the company?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356590/motorola-cliq-android-smartphone-everything-you-need-to-know" rel="nofollow">Motorola Cliq</a> is the Android OS on Motorola hardware. Like Palm before it, Motorola decided that Windows Mobile 6.5/7 would be too little, too late to combat the iPhone menace. But instead of going in house and creating something from scratch, Motorola decided to take an already stable OS and build social networking features directly into the interface. So yes, it&#8217;s basically an Android phone; but it&#8217;s an Android phone++.</p>
<p>Motorola&#8217;s Cliq delivers on its social networking promise quite admirably, even if there are a few design quirks that prevent the experience from being perfect. And although it&#8217;s a little sluggish on the hardware side&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381829/why-android-phones-are-slow-today" rel="nofollow">as sluggish as any of the other Android phones out there now</a>, that is&mdash;the fact that it has a good physical keyboard and solid Motorola hardware behind it makes the Cliq a very interesting contender in the Android world.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cliq4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cliq4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>The Hardware is solid, except when it&#8217;s not</h1>
<p>Moto is no stranger to building its own phones, so you&#8217;d expect some smart hardware know-how to go into Cliq&#8217;s design. That&#8217;s only kinda true. Everything on the phone is where you&#8217;d expect it to be and buttons are more-or-less in acceptable locations, but there&#8217;s a looseness in the slide-out keyboard that&#8217;s more irritating the more I play with it. I can&#8217;t tell if it&#8217;s because the slider doesn&#8217;t quite lock into place like it should&mdash;there&#8217;s a little give in both the open and closed positions&mdash;but the &#8220;Oreo-ing&#8221; is really distracting. It&#8217;s not as if the screen portion will pop off, it&#8217;s just an annoying looseness in the phone that makes you feel like they didn&#8217;t quite solve the puzzle of fitting everything in place.</p>
<p>A hardware keyboard is always a welcome thing to have, and the Cliq&#8217;s behaves well. There&#8217;s enough spacing in each of the keys that it&#8217;s easy to type, but not too much that it&#8217;s occupying a lot of space. There could have been some better arrangement of symbol keys (the underscore is buried under a symbols menu), but that&#8217;s just being nitpicky. Overall, it&#8217;s a solid keyboard that&#8217;s quick to enter data with.</p>
<h1>Other build quirks</h1>
<p>The wobbliness of the slider means that you need to grip only the bottom (keyboard) part of the phone when you&#8217;re taking a photo, or else the screen will slide open and you&#8217;ll probably drop your phone. Also, Motorola decided to make the power switch flush with the right side of the phone so even Daredevil would have a hard time finding it by touch. Since the power button also lets you toggle Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, airplane mode and GPS, that&#8217;s a bad design.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cliq2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cliq2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You have to open up the battery cover to shove an up-to 32GB microSD card in there, but since you&#8217;ll rarely replace that (use a microUSB to transfer files), it&#8217;s not a huge deal. I do like the fact that there&#8217;s no cover on the microSD slot, as well as the presence of the now-obligatory vibrate toggle on the left side of the phone. Its 3.5mm headphone jack being located directly on the top of the phone kinda screws up the lines a bit, but I&#8217;d rather a slightly uglier phone than not having a 3.5mm jack.</p>
<h1>Power and battery</h1>
<p>Because the Cliq runs the same processor as the current Android phones now&mdash;like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier" rel="nofollow">Hero</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5331798/t+mobile-mytouch-3g-review" rel="nofollow">MyTouch 3G</a>&mdash;there&#8217;s not a whole lot of performance difference between the devices. They&#8217;re all kinda slow. Not unusably slow, but transitions and animations don&#8217;t pop immediately. And this sluggishness might be part of the reason why interacting with the touchscreen isn&#8217;t as fluid a process as it could be, and why sometimes when you&#8217;re swiping between emails or tweets, the page will pop back into place and you have to swipe a second time.</p>
<p>As for the battery life, you can pretty much imagine how much use you&#8217;ll get out of an always-connected device that gets pushed emails, tweets and Facebook updates all day. Even if you don&#8217;t make a lot of calls, you&#8217;ll have to charge the device every night. And if you do do a lot of texting and emailing and calling and tweeting, you&#8217;d better get an external charger.</p>
<p>The main drain seems to be both the push and the fact that you&#8217;re using the phone a lot to keep up with everything that&#8217;s happening on your social networks. Motorola built a double-edged sword on that one; people want to use it a lot for checking status updates, but in turn the 1420 mAh battery runs out in less than a day.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cliq1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cliq1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Hardware features we like</h1>
<p>There are a couple nice touches that we&#8217;re appreciative of, such as the blinking light on the front for notifications, which has been on BlackBerries for a while. Great if you don&#8217;t get a lot of emails or if you don&#8217;t follow a lot of people. You can also wake up the phone using the facebuttons, not just the power toggle, so two quick menu button presses will get you to the home screen immediately.</p>
<p>Having a D pad is going to be useful in the future when Android developers start making games that take advantage of it, but you can use it now in NES/SNES emulators. And the camera is a beefy 5-megapixel autofocus, which produces decent photos compared to other Android phones. Plus, call quality is pretty good, something Motorola has managed to do well even when their software has faltered.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/thescreen.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_thescreen.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Software</h1>
<p>Seeing as Android has been available for more than a while, and everyone should be familiar with what it does, I&#8217;m going to focus on the Cliq-specific sections. Suffice it to say that it can do everything other Android phones can, including downloading OTA Amazon MP3s and accessing all the apps in the Marketplace. The most important of Motorola&#8217;s additions are the home screen widgets, so we&#8217;ll start there.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/home1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_home1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>The home screen widgets</h1>
<p>The four widgets of note are the status widget, the messaging widget, the happenings widget and the news/RSS widget. The news widget is self-explanatory, and really cool that a phone would have a built-in RSS reader right on the home screen, but the others are a little bit trickier. The status widget lets you update your &#8220;status&#8221; to any of your social networking sites, like Facebook or Twitter. The messages widget consolidates ALL your 1:1 messaging, like emails, SMS, DMs on Twitter or private messages on Facebook. The happenings is a feed of <i>other people&#8217;s</i> status updates on your social networks.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/6_01.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_6_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Messaging Widget</strong><br /> I don&#8217;t know why, but it&#8217;s very satisfying to be able to swipe through your emails directly from the home screen, quickly deleting or replying with just one tap. The problem comes from the way it&#8217;s implemented and the lack of screen space, because you can&#8217;t see the recipients list to see if you&#8217;re the only person address to in an email, nor can you do a reply all if there are multiple people. And it doesn&#8217;t tell you if you have an attachment.</p>
<p>Basically it&#8217;s just a small window to your email, and you&#8217;ll have to actually open up the traditional email app to do any communication beyond the basics. And there&#8217;s also a full-blown Messaging APP, which consolidates all your accounts like the widget does.</p>
<p><strong>Happenings Widget</strong><br /> This is where your all your social networks are rolled into one big feed. Again, it&#8217;s a time saver to have all these updates in one place and being able to swipe through them, though sometimes you get way too many updates to realistically do so. What we would like is if there was an option to customize <i>which</i> networks displayed in the widget, so we could, say, have only Twitter and leave out Facebook. Right now it&#8217;s an all or nothing affair, and you have to go into the Happenings app to see everything in list form and to be able to view only one network at a time.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/home2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_home2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The widget does allow you to directly interact and respond to people&#8217;s updates, so you can comment on people&#8217;s walls or do an @reply to someone&#8217;s tweet. All you have to do is start typing in a particular section and some menu option will pop up, prompting you with context-specific actions you can do.</p>
<p><strong>News Widget</strong><br /> The RSS widget behaves pretty much the same way as the previous two, allowing you to swipe through news items like you would in a standard RSS reader. Motorola was kind enough to bundle a few types of RSS feeds together, and Gizmodo is part of the Technology one. Good choice dudes.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/adams.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_adams.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Nice touches</h1>
<p>By avoiding the creation of an entire operation system from scratch, the Motorola engineers had time on their hands to really think about the user experience, and it definitely shows in all these small touches and shortcuts they put in.</p>
<p>&bull; There are some slick transition animations when you open up widgets and apps, which are quick enough to not be distracting, but slow enough to distract you for a second while your program is loading<br /> &bull; Faces are fetched and attached to your contacts automatically, and you can choose whether you want to grab the images from Google or Facebook. This way you can always have some kind of picture for a person when they call you for easy recognition<br /> &bull; The MotoBlur account you have to create on setup backs up some of your settings so that you can re-load it in the event of phone theft<br /> &bull; Speaking of phone stealing, there&#8217;s a free service online that&#8217;s similar to MobileMe that you can use to locate your phone from the web<br /> &bull; There&#8217;s a five panel home screen. Eh? Ehh??<br /> &bull; The call button got moved to a soft button, eliminating the need for two hard buttons on the outside of the phone. You also get a contacts button instead of a end call button, since you don&#8217;t need to hang up if you&#8217;re not in a call.<br /> &bull; There&#8217;s visual voicemail<br /> &bull; People&#8217;s faces everywhere, and you can see their latest status updates when a call is initiated<br /> &bull; You can manually link contacts together, like on Palm&#8217;s webOS, in case the phone doesn&#8217;t automatically recognize that Frucci is the same Adam Frucci you have in your Gmail<br /> &bull; A self help widget is there when you get the phone, walking you through a few features you might not see<br /> &bull; There are shortcuts everywhere, which would usually be a bad thing since you have to poke around to find them, but they&#8217;re implemented in such a way that it actually makes sense<br /> &bull; You can type on the home screen to find a contact. This makes sense in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOTO CLIQ" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/moto-cliq/" rel="nofollow">Moto Cliq</a> world since the Cliq is a person-centric device, whereas on other phones it would make more sense to bring up a Google search instead<br /> &bull; And typing in the applications tray searches through your apps</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/search.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_search.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Gripes</h1>
<p>The software&#8217;s not flawless, however, and you will run into some minor annoyances even with all the niceties.<br /> &bull; Yahoo Mail only works over 3G, not Wi-Fi. This most likely has to do with some deal or legal restriction, but it doesn&#8217;t make the decision less annoying. If we had to choose between Yahoo only on 3G and no Yahoo, we&#8217;d pick the 3G<br /> &bull; There isn&#8217;t really desktop syncing for your contacts or calendar. You can send movies and music and photos over the microUSB connection, but Motorola really wants you to put your contacts on either Gmail or a social network and pull them down that way</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get a lot of fine-grained control over accounts. (Yes, I made you wait this long for a pun on the top photo.) For example, you can&#8217;t tell your phone to only pull down contacts from Gmail and not Facebook, or choose to display only your Twitter and MySpace contacts at once. It&#8217;s basically all or just one. <strong>More account customizability would be the number one software target we&#8217;d ask Motorola&#8217;s team to aim for</strong>, and something we&#8217;re eager to see in Blur version 1.5.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox nofollow" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/motomotocliq.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_motomotocliq.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>The Whole Experience</h1>
<p>Like we said in the hardware section, the major thing holding back the Cliq from being a fantastic phone is the processor. The animations are smooth, the UI touches are smart and the social networking stuff is useful; we just wish we could have a bit more account customization, do all of that on faster hardware. Once Motorola gets the Blur platform onto a more powerful phone and works through some of the software quirks we noticed, they&#8217;re going to have a really good Android phone on their hands.</p>
<p>Is this the phone that Motorola needs to bring it back into the smartphone race? It could be. They were smart enough to know that just doing another Android phone wasn&#8217;t enough in itself, so they pulled together and created all this social networking glue to bind the experience together. It&#8217;s cohesive enough to call the Cliq a different experience from other, similar devices like the Sprint HTC Hero, and is a pretty damn good first step in a possible Motorola comeback. [<a href="http://www.motorola.com/consumers/US-EN/Motorola-CLIQ-US-EN.do?vgnextoid=62045a6e00be2210VgnVCM1000006d06b10aRCRD" rel="nofollow">Motorola</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Social networking features are quite good<br /> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Lots of little touches that improve on the base Android platform<br /> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Hardware keyboard<br /> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">Decent hardware except for the Oreo-like keyboard action<br /> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">It&#8217;s an Android phone at heart, which means you&#8217;ll either like it or dislike it, based on how you feel about the platform<br /> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">A slow-ish CPU makes the experience weaker than it could be</p>
<p> <br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/><br />
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/><br />
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=246cae4d769df99fd5bada23c0954d8c&#038;p=1" rel="nofollow"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=246cae4d769df99fd5bada23c0954d8c&#038;p=1"/></a><br />
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2226"/></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lwu8khnKTMiW8mtvE6cbrShPg5g/0/da" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lwu8khnKTMiW8mtvE6cbrShPg5g/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lwu8khnKTMiW8mtvE6cbrShPg5g/1/da" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lwu8khnKTMiW8mtvE6cbrShPg5g/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:H0mrP-F8Qgo" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:yIl2AUoC8zA" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:D7DqB2pKExk" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:V_sGLiPBpWU" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=f_6GNnnOlzg:tyh9naMZNvM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/f_6GNnnOlzg" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MOTOBLUR ported to the G1, unreleased CLIQ looks on in envy</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AndroidHack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AndroidRom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HackedRom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android rom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacked rom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/10/hacks/motoleak-hacker-ports-blur-to-htc-g1/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/motoblur-g1-1.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
It's unclear exactly how <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MOTOBLUR/">MOTOBLUR</a> software might've leaked into the wild, but it's already been repurposed in the best sort of way into a G1-friendly ROM. Despite its beta status it's looking relatively snappy, but there are still some missing elements like WiFi and Bluetooth. If anything it's a testament to how portable and hackable Android is turning out to be so far, and we look forward to the ongoing improvements to Android by diverse manufacturers being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/htc-hero-rosie-rom-demoed-on-g1/">disseminated far and wide</a> -- though if Motorola had its way, it'd probably at least happen <em>after</em> the relevant device has hit the market. Video is after the break.<br />
<br />
[Via <a href="http://onlygizmos.com/motorola-blur-ui-on-htc-g1/2009/10/">OnlyGizmos</a>; thanks Annkur]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MOTOBLUR ported to the G1, unreleased CLIQ looks on in envy</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/">MOTOBLUR ported to the G1, unreleased CLIQ looks on in envy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/10/hacks/motoleak-hacker-ports-blur-to-htc-g1/">Read</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19191124/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/10/hacks/motoleak-hacker-ports-blur-to-htc-g1/" rel="nofollow"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/motoblur-g1-1.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s unclear exactly how <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MOTOBLUR/" rel="nofollow">MOTOBLUR</a> software might&#8217;ve leaked into the wild, but it&#8217;s already been repurposed in the best sort of way into a G1-friendly ROM. Despite its beta status it&#8217;s looking relatively snappy, but there are still some missing elements like WiFi and Bluetooth. If anything it&#8217;s a testament to how portable and hackable Android is turning out to be so far, and we look forward to the ongoing improvements to Android by diverse manufacturers being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/htc-hero-rosie-rom-demoed-on-g1/" rel="nofollow">disseminated far and wide</a> &#8212; though if Motorola had its way, it&#8217;d probably at least happen <em>after</em> the relevant device has hit the market. Video is after the break.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://onlygizmos.com/motorola-blur-ui-on-htc-g1/2009/10/" rel="nofollow">OnlyGizmos</a>; thanks Annkur]
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/" rel="bookmark nofollow">Continue reading <em>MOTOBLUR ported to the G1, unreleased CLIQ looks on in envy</em></a></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag nofollow">Cellphones</a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/" rel="nofollow">MOTOBLUR ported to the G1, unreleased CLIQ looks on in envy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com" rel="nofollow">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/" rel="nofollow">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href=http://androidandme.com/2009/10/hacks/motoleak-hacker-ports-blur-to-htc-g1/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/" rel="bookmark nofollow" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19191124/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email" rel="nofollow">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry" rel="nofollow">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/09/motoblur-ported-to-the-g1-unreleased-cliq-looks-on-in-envy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Motorola’s MotoBlur ported to a HTC G1</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/09/video-motorola%e2%80%99s-motoblur-ported-to-a-htc-g1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/09/video-motorola%e2%80%99s-motoblur-ported-to-a-htc-g1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=117276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/motoblur.JPG">Hey, hey. This hack will probably make more than a few <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/tag/g1/">G1</a> owners giddy. Apparently someone got their hands on a leaked copy of a <a href="http://crunchgear.com/tag/cliq/">Motorola Cliq</a> ROM, which just so happens to have all the stuff for Motorola's custom Android build, MotoBlur, and has converted it for the G1. Don't ask us where these files are or the install instructions for your G1. We don't know. But what we do know is that this port probably doesn't make the Motorola suits all that happy, but this is the joy of an open platform like Android. Get use to it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="620" height="405" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NJhqxcpUK4o&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="620" height="405" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NJhqxcpUK4o&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Hey, hey. <a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/10/hacks/motoleak-hacker-ports-blur-to-htc-g1/" rel="nofollow">This hack</a> will probably make more than a few <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/tag/g1/" rel="nofollow">G1</a> owners giddy. Apparently someone got their hands on a leaked copy of a <a href="http://crunchgear.com/tag/cliq/" rel="nofollow">Motorola Cliq</a> ROM, which just so happens to have all the stuff for Motorola&#8217;s custom Android build, MotoBlur, and has converted it for the G1. Don&#8217;t ask us where these files are or the install instructions for your G1. We don&#8217;t know. But what we do know is that this port probably doesn&#8217;t make the Motorola suits all that happy, but this is the joy of an open platform like Android. Get use to it.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/y1Hdwa9aV97xSyo9YJFco5OHbxA/0/da" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/y1Hdwa9aV97xSyo9YJFco5OHbxA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/y1Hdwa9aV97xSyo9YJFco5OHbxA/1/da" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/y1Hdwa9aV97xSyo9YJFco5OHbxA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?a=akGoIip-bAA:UvDRBFd7-DM:V_sGLiPBpWU" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?i=akGoIip-bAA:UvDRBFd7-DM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?a=akGoIip-bAA:UvDRBFd7-DM:F7zBnMyn0Lo" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?i=akGoIip-bAA:UvDRBFd7-DM:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?a=akGoIip-bAA:UvDRBFd7-DM:yIl2AUoC8zA" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/09/video-motorola%e2%80%99s-motoblur-ported-to-a-htc-g1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon Motorola Sholes not running MOTOBLUR?</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nilay Patel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola sholes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MotorolaSholes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sholes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/10-06-09sholesenhanced.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<div style="text-align: left">We'd been hearing rumors that the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/sholes">Motorola Sholes</a> on Verizon wouldn't be running <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/motoblur">MOTOBLUR</a> because it's to be a <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/googleexperience">"Google Experience"</a> device, and while that seemed silly at first, it certainly looks like the device Verizon CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/second-verizon-android-phone-to-be-the-htc-hero-motorola-sholes/">Lowell McAdam was waving around this morning</a> was running stock Android. How can we tell? For starters, Blur has a different 3G icon in the menu bar, and different icons for several apps -- Calendar leaps out to us here. What's more, that certainly appears to be the default Android search box lurking back there, something that's not part of the Blur homescreen. That's definitely odd, considering how big a bet <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/motorola-introduces-the-motoblur-android-skin/">Motorola seemed to be placing on Blur</a> as its handset differentiator -- and doubly odd since the HTC Hero Eric Schmidt was holding at the same photo op <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/second-verizon-android-phone-to-be-the-htc-hero-motorola-sholes/">was running Sense on top of Android</a>. We'll have to see how this one shakes out when the Sholes is actually launched, but for now we'd say those rumors are looking awfully true.<br />
<br />
[Image credit: <a href="http://www.apimages.com/OneUp.aspx?st=k&#38;kw=google%20verizon%20wireless&#38;showact=results&#38;sort=creationdatelower%3Areversealphabetical&#38;intv=None&#38;sh=10&#38;kwstyle=or&#38;adte=1254859620&#38;dah=-1&#38;pagez=40&#38;cfasstyle=AND&#38;nextdah=27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C13%2C13%2C13%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX&#38;rids=02ac11038a184581b915259eb2a222cc&#38;dbm=PThirtyDay&#38;page=1&#38;xslt=1&#38;dispname=091006021512%2C%20Google%20Verizon%20Wireless#">Associated Press</a>, under license; thanks to everyone who sent this in]</div>
<div style="text-align: left"> </div>
<br /><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Verizon Motorola Sholes not running MOTOBLUR?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/">Verizon Motorola Sholes not running MOTOBLUR?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19186616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/10-06-09sholesenhanced.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">We&#8217;d been hearing rumors that the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/sholes" rel="nofollow">Motorola Sholes</a> on Verizon wouldn&#8217;t be running <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/motoblur" rel="nofollow">MOTOBLUR</a> because it&#8217;s to be a <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/googleexperience" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Google Experience&#8221;</a> device, and while that seemed silly at first, it certainly looks like the device Verizon CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/second-verizon-android-phone-to-be-the-htc-hero-motorola-sholes/" rel="nofollow">Lowell McAdam was waving around this morning</a> was running stock Android. How can we tell? For starters, Blur has a different 3G icon in the menu bar, and different icons for several apps &#8212; Calendar leaps out to us here. What&#8217;s more, that certainly appears to be the default Android search box lurking back there, something that&#8217;s not part of the Blur homescreen. That&#8217;s definitely odd, considering how big a bet <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/motorola-introduces-the-motoblur-android-skin/" rel="nofollow">Motorola seemed to be placing on Blur</a> as its handset differentiator &#8212; and doubly odd since the HTC Hero Eric Schmidt was holding at the same photo op <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/second-verizon-android-phone-to-be-the-htc-hero-motorola-sholes/" rel="nofollow">was running Sense on top of Android</a>. We&#8217;ll have to see how this one shakes out when the Sholes is actually launched, but for now we&#8217;d say those rumors are looking awfully true.</p>
<p>[Image credit: <a href="http://www.apimages.com/OneUp.aspx?st=k&amp;kw=google%20verizon%20wireless&amp;showact=results&amp;sort=creationdatelower%3Areversealphabetical&amp;intv=None&amp;sh=10&amp;kwstyle=or&amp;adte=1254859620&amp;dah=-1&amp;pagez=40&amp;cfasstyle=AND&amp;nextdah=27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C27%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C13%2C13%2C13%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX%2CX&amp;rids=02ac11038a184581b915259eb2a222cc&amp;dbm=PThirtyDay&amp;page=1&amp;xslt=1&amp;dispname=091006021512%2C%20Google%20Verizon%20Wireless#" rel="nofollow">Associated Press</a>, under license; thanks to everyone who sent this in]</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"> </div>
<p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/" rel="bookmark nofollow">Continue reading <em>Verizon Motorola Sholes not running MOTOBLUR?</em></a></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag nofollow">Cellphones</a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/" rel="nofollow">Verizon Motorola Sholes not running MOTOBLUR?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com" rel="nofollow">Engadget</a> on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/" rel="nofollow">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/" rel="bookmark nofollow" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19186616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email" rel="nofollow">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry" rel="nofollow">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/06/verizon-motorola-sholes-not-running-motoblur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola CLIQ / DEXT exhaustively photographed, previewed</title>
		<link>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nilay Patel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MotorolaCliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MotorolaDext]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dext]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola cliq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola dext]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.mobile-review.com/review/motorola-dext-en.shtml"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/10-04-09cliq.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
The <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/cliq">Motorola CLIQ</a> hasn't gone on sale yet, but that hasn't stopped a few units from leaking out here and there -- Eldar at mobile-review just posted up one of the most thorough photo previews of the chunky slider we've seen yet. Interestingly, the keyboard continues to draw mixed reviews -- while <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/motorola-cliq-first-hands-on-impressions/">we rather liked it</a> when we tried it out, m-r says it's just "okay" and that the five-way rocker "wasn't very handy." We'll have to use this thing a while for ourselves before we make up our minds, but for now, we'd direct you to the read link for a ton more photos.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, MrArgie]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/">Motorola CLIQ / DEXT exhaustively photographed, previewed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.mobile-review.com/review/motorola-dext-en.shtml">Read</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19183746/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.mobile-review.com/review/motorola-dext-en.shtml" rel="nofollow"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/10-04-09cliq.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>The <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/cliq" rel="nofollow">Motorola CLIQ</a> hasn&#8217;t gone on sale yet, but that hasn&#8217;t stopped a few units from leaking out here and there &#8212; Eldar at mobile-review just posted up one of the most thorough photo previews of the chunky slider we&#8217;ve seen yet. Interestingly, the keyboard continues to draw mixed reviews &#8212; while <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/motorola-cliq-first-hands-on-impressions/" rel="nofollow">we rather liked it</a> when we tried it out, m-r says it&#8217;s just &#8220;okay&#8221; and that the five-way rocker &#8220;wasn&#8217;t very handy.&#8221; We&#8217;ll have to use this thing a while for ourselves before we make up our minds, but for now, we&#8217;d direct you to the read link for a ton more photos.</p>
<p>[Thanks, MrArgie]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag nofollow">Cellphones</a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/" rel="nofollow">Motorola CLIQ / DEXT exhaustively photographed, previewed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com" rel="nofollow">Engadget</a> on Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/" rel="nofollow">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href=http://www.mobile-review.com/review/motorola-dext-en.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/" rel="bookmark nofollow" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19183746/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email" rel="nofollow">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry" rel="nofollow">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toolsngadgets.com/2009/10/04/motorola-cliq-dext-exhaustively-photographed-previewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

